Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 29(3): 1683-1691, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1463293

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical delays are associated with invasive cancer for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). During the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) was used as a bridge until postponed surgeries resumed. This study sought to determine the impact of NET on the rate of invasive cancer for patients with a diagnosis of DCIS who have a surgical delay compared with those not treated with NET. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, the study identified women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) DCIS. The presence of invasion on final pathology was evaluated after stratifying by receipt of NET and by intervals based on time from diagnosis to surgery (≤30, 31-60, 61-90, 91-120, or 121-365 days). RESULTS: Of 109,990 women identified with HR+ DCIS, 276 (0.3%) underwent NET. The mean duration of NET was 74.4 days. The overall unadjusted rate of invasive cancer was similar between those who received NET ((15.6%) and those who did not (12.3%) (p = 0.10). In the multivariable analysis, neither the use nor the duration of NET were independently associated with invasion, but the trend across time-to-surgery categories demonstrated a higher rate of upgrade to invasive cancer in the no-NET group (p < 0.001), but not in the NET group (p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of a pre-COVID cohort showed evidence for a protective effect of NET in HR+ DCIS against the development of invasive cancer as the preoperative delay increased, although an appropriately powered prospective trial is needed for a definitive answer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , COVID-19 , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/epidemiología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/epidemiología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Am Surg ; 88(3): 471-479, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1443706

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has required new treatment paradigms to limit exposures and optimize hospital resources, including the use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAET) as bridging therapy for HR+/HER2-invasive tumors and DCIS. While this approach has been used in locally advanced disease, it is unclear how it may affect outcomes in resectable HR+/HER2- tumors. METHODS: Women ≥18 years diagnosed with in situ (Tis) or non-metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer from March-May 2019 and 2020 were included. Fisher's exact test and two-sample t test were used to compare baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes between strata. Sub-analysis was performed between patients who received primary surgery vs a bridging NAET approach. RESULTS: Despite similar clinical characteristics, patients in 2019 were more likely to have a surgery-first approach (75% vs 42%, P-value = .0007), receive surgery sooner (22 vs 29 days, P-value < .001), and within 60 days from diagnosis date (100% vs 85%, P-value = .0301). Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy was a more prevalent approach in 2020 (48% vs 7%, P-value < .0001). Rates of clinical to pathologic up-staging remained consistent across primary surgery vs bridging NAET subgroups (P-value = .9253). DISCUSSION: Pandemic-driven treatment protocols provide a unique opportunity to assess the utility of bridging endocrine therapy for resectable HR+/HER2- tumors. Differences in clinical and pathologic staging were similar across groups and did not appear to be affected by receipt of NAET. Our limited cohort demonstrates this strategic therapeutic avenue can optimize health care utilization and may be a reasonable approach when delaying surgery is preferred.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Pandemias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/química , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/química , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , North Carolina , Probabilidad , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de Estrógenos , Receptores de Progesterona , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Cardiovasc Toxicol ; 21(9): 687-694, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1237553

RESUMEN

Several medicines, including cancer therapies, are known to alter the electrophysiological function of ventricular myocytes resulting in abnormal prolongation and dispersion of ventricular repolarization (quantified by multi-lead QTc measurement). This effect could be amplified by other concomitant factors (e.g., combination with other drugs affecting the QT, and/or electrolyte abnormalities, such as especially hypokalemia, hypomagnesaemia, and hypocalcemia). Usually, this condition results in higher risk of torsade de point and other life-threatening arrhythmias, related to unrecognized unpaired cardiac ventricular repolarization reserve (VRR). Being VRR a dynamic phenomenon, QT prolongation might often not be identified during the 10-s standard 12-lead ECG recording at rest, leaving the patient at increased risk for life-threatening event. We report the case of a 49-year woman, undergoing tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer, which alteration of ventricular repolarization reserve, persisting also after correction of concomitant recurrent hypokalemia, was evidenced only after manual measurements of the corrected QT (QTc) interval from selected intervals of the 12-lead ECG Holter monitoring. This otherwise missed finding was fundamental to drive the discontinuation of tamoxifen, shifting to another "safer" therapeutic option, and to avoid the use of potentially arrhythmogenic antibiotics when treating a bilateral pneumonia in recent COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/tratamiento farmacológico , Electrocardiografía , Antagonistas de Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/efectos de los fármacos , Tamoxifeno/efectos adversos , Potenciales de Acción , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Arritmias Cardíacas/inducido químicamente , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Femenino , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Bull Cancer ; 107(5): 528-537, 2020 05.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-699620
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA